Sign up to see more
SignupAlready a member?
LoginBy continuing, you agree to Sociomix's Terms of Service, Privacy Policy
Ashton Kutcher is calling out something most of us have noticed but never said out loud. The actor, who plays a tech billionaire peddling dangerous beauty drugs in his new FX series, just pointed out a glaring contradiction in how society judges cosmetic procedures.
It turns out the real hypocrisy might be more disturbing than anything in his upcoming horror show
During a recent interview with Vanity Fair, Kutcher shared a conversation he had with his wife, actress Mila Kunis. Her observation cuts straight to the heart of our weird relationship with physical enhancement.
"Somebody walks around with braces or Invisalign, and that's totally fine," Kunis told him. "But the minute someone gets a rhinoplasty, that's viewed differently."
Kutcher expanded on this point with sharp clarity. Both procedures are cosmetic enhancements, he explained. One fixes your teeth, one fixes your nose. Yet nobody judges you for getting braces or celebrates how your teeth turned out afterward. But rhinoplasty, liposuction, or hair transplants? Those come with stigma attached.
"It depends on what body part it is," Kutcher said. "That's a really weird thing."
He's absolutely right. The distinction is arbitrary. We've collectively decided that some forms of self-improvement are acceptable while others mark you as vain or fake. There's no logical consistency to where we draw that line.
The 47-year-old actor told Vanity Fair there's a global obsession with beauty that is intellectually ripe for conversation. That conversation couldn't come at a better time. We're living through a moment when the beauty industry has more power and reach than ever before.
The cosmetic enhancement market has exploded. From filters that reshape our faces in real time to weight-loss drugs that have become cultural phenomena, we're surrounded by pressure to look a certain way. Yet we still pretend some enhancements are natural while others are shameful.
Kutcher's comments land with extra weight because of the role he's playing. In The Beauty, premiering January 21 on FX, he portrays a villainous tech billionaire profiting from black-market pharmaceuticals. The series follows FBI agents investigating a sexually transmitted virus that transforms ordinary people into visions of physical perfection, but with terrifying consequences.
The show explores the deadly measures people take in pursuit of their dream body. It's body horror as social commentary, and the timing feels deliberate.
Kutcher didn't shy away from discussing one of the most controversial beauty trends right now. "We're seeing the proliferation of GLP-1s," he said, referring to drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy that were originally developed for diabetes but are now widely used for weight loss.
He added a pointed detail: "We're even seeing our current administration make them cheaper and more available."
In November 2025, the Trump administration announced deals with pharmaceutical giants Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly that would lower the cost of GLP-1 drugs for many Americans, including those on Medicare. The agreement means patients using the new service will pay roughly $350 for a month's supply, scaling down to $250 over two years for those paying out of pocket.
Medicare patients will have a $50 copay for the drugs and could see the new pricing as soon as mid-2026. For the first time, Medicare will cover obesity treatments, expanding access to millions of Americans.
Here's where it gets complicated. Are government-subsidized weight-loss drugs a public health breakthrough or a dangerous precedent? If we're making these medications cheap and accessible, are we tacitly endorsing the idea that thinness is so important that taxpayers should fund it?
Kutcher's villain character in The Beauty profits from this exact impulse, the desperate hunger for physical perfection. The parallel between his fictional role and real-world policy feels uncomfortably close.
There's an elephant in the room that makes this story even more fascinating. Demi Moore, Kutcher's ex-wife, received her first Oscar nomination for The Substance, a film that tackles nearly identical themes to The Beauty.
Both projects are body horror stories about the extreme lengths people go to for beauty. Both premiered during the same awards season. Both feature aging stars confronting Hollywood's obsession with youth.
The comparison was inevitable. When Vanity Fair asked Kutcher about the similarities between the two projects, he gave a surprisingly honest answer: "I haven't seen that film."
That admission speaks volumes. Kutcher and Moore were married from 2005 to 2013, divorcing after he began dating his current wife, Mila Kunis. The relationship ended amid tabloid scrutiny and personal pain. Kutcher later told Esquire that divorce feels like a wholesale failure.
Now both are tackling beauty standards in horror films released within months of each other. He hasn't watched hers. Make of that what you will.
Moore's performance in The Substance has been widely celebrated. She won the Golden Globe Award for Best Actress in a Motion Picture and the Screen Actors Guild Award for Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Leading Role. Though she was nominated for the Oscar, she did not win, with the award going to Mikey Madison for Anora.
The film explores an aging actress who takes a mysterious substance to create a younger version of herself, with devastating results. It's a brutal examination of Hollywood's treatment of women as they age, and Moore's willingness to be vulnerable on screen has earned widespread praise.
Meanwhile, Kutcher is playing the villain who creates the beauty-enhancing virus. The thematic overlap is striking, even if the execution differs. One is a film about a woman destroyed by beauty standards; the other is a series about a man profiting from them.
Kutcher hesitated to take on a role in a TV show as a father of two. "That's a lot of work over an extended period of time. I like to be home with my kids in Los Angeles," he said.
His children with Kunis, daughter Wyatt Isabelle (10 years old) and son Dimitri Portwood (8 years old), are his priority. The couple is famously protective of their kids, rarely sharing photos or bringing them to public events.
This adds another layer to Kutcher's comments about beauty standards. He's raising a daughter in a world that will judge her appearance relentlessly. He's married to a woman who has navigated Hollywood's impossible beauty expectations for decades. These aren't abstract conversations for him.
Ryan Murphy, the prolific creator behind American Horror Story and Glee, personally convinced Kutcher to take the role. "I wrote this role for you," Murphy told him. "You've never really played a villain, and I think that this is the villain for you."
It's Kutcher's first true antagonist role, and the timing is perfect. He's old enough to have perspective on Hollywood's machinery, young enough to still be in the game, and positioned perfectly to critique an industry he's been part of for over two decades.
Here's what often gets left out of conversations about cosmetic procedures: access. Rich people get better, safer treatments. They can afford the best surgeons, the newest medications, the most natural-looking results.
Everyone else? They're stuck with risky alternatives or nothing at all. The black-market beauty industry Kutcher's character exploits in The Beauty isn't science fiction. People already buy counterfeit Botox, unregulated fillers, and dangerous weight-loss drugs because the real versions are too expensive.
When the government subsidizes GLP-1 drugs, it might democratize access. But it also raises questions. Why do obesity drugs get subsidized when other chronic conditions don't? Is it really about health, or is it about appearance?
The answer probably makes a lot of people uncomfortable.
After examining this issue from every angle, here's what I think: Kutcher is spot-on about the hypocrisy, but the solution isn't simple.
We have two choices. Either we accept all cosmetic enhancements without judgment, or we question why we're so obsessed with physical perfection that we're willing to take extreme risks and spend enormous sums to achieve it.
What we can't do is keep pretending that braces are wholesome while nose jobs are shameful. That's intellectually dishonest and emotionally damaging.
The government subsidizing weight-loss drugs feels like a slippery slope. Yes, obesity is linked to serious health problems. But so are dozens of other conditions that don't get the same level of intervention. The cynic in me wonders if we're only willing to subsidize treatments that make people look a certain way.
As for Kutcher not watching The Substance, I actually respect that. Sometimes you need boundaries with your past. He's moved on, built a new life, and doesn't owe his ex-wife's career any particular attention. The fact that they're both exploring similar themes says more about the cultural moment we're in than it does about their relationship.
What strikes me most is how perfectly timed this conversation is. Beauty standards have never been more visible, more profitable, or more dangerous. We're injecting ourselves with drugs, altering our faces with filters, and pretending it's all normal.
Kutcher's right. It's weird. And it's time we talked about why.
Ryan Murphy compared the scale of The Beauty series to Game of Thrones, with filming locations spanning Paris, Venice, Rome, and New York. The show features an impressive cast including Evan Peters, Rebecca Hall, Anthony Ramos, and Jeremy Pope, with guest appearances from Bella Hadid, Isabella Rossellini, and Ben Platt.
The premise is both ridiculous and uncomfortably plausible. A sexually transmitted treatment makes you beautiful but eventually kills you. People take it anyway. That's horror, sure, but it's also barely exaggerated from reality.
We already know people take dangerous shortcuts for beauty. Underground cosmetic procedures injure and kill people every year. Weight-loss drugs carry risks. Even legal procedures can go wrong.
The question The Beauty seems to ask is this: how far would you go? And more importantly, who profits when you make that choice?
Kutcher's villain character has the answer. In a world obsessed with appearance, the people selling perfection always win. The rest of us are just paying the price.
Ashton Kutcher has stumbled onto something important with his comments about plastic surgery double standards. Whether intentionally or not, he's opened a conversation about the arbitrary rules we apply to cosmetic enhancement.
Braces versus nose jobs. Hair transplants versus teeth whitening. Government-funded weight-loss drugs versus stigmatized cosmetic procedures. None of it makes sense when you actually think about it.
The Beauty premieres January 21, 2026, on FX and Hulu, just as this conversation is reaching a fever pitch. The timing couldn't be better. Or worse, depending on how you look at it.
One thing is certain: we're all complicit in the beauty obsession Kutcher is critiquing. We judge, we participate, we contradict ourselves. Maybe watching a horror show about it will help us see how absurd it's become.
Or maybe we'll just keep scrolling past the uncomfortable questions, straight to the next before-and-after photo.