Hints At Illusion: Irreversible Laws

What can be gained through mental experimentation with the Second Law of Thermodynamics?

So it will be with the occurrences corresponding in the reverse universe to almost any common occurrence in the physical world of our experience. Everything seems to be perfectly explicable in terms of physical laws, but at the same time, the combinations of motions seem to have something utterly strange about them. Hence there is some point of difference between the real universe and the reverse universe, and hence there must be some property of the real universe that is irreversible. This irreversible property is found in what is called the second law of thermodynamics.

William James Sidis

This physical law, as well as all those which are derived from it, is irreversible. Furthermore, only such physical laws as are derived from the second law of thermodynamics are irreversible; so that this law constitutes the sole difference between the real and the reverse universe.

William James Sidis

“The sole difference between the real and the reverse universe” is the Second Law of Thermodynamics in this examination of the nature and structure of reality via its apparent laws. Sidis in The Animate and the Inanimate makes this distinct motion about this particular law compared to other laws. 

In this sense, the Second Law of Thermodynamics becomes a fulcrum for the operations of the first universe, or the real universe, and the reverse universe, or the reverse time universe. All physical laws, according to the earlier portions of the text, must be, by necessity, reversible. 

While, at least, one is not. More will be expounded in later chapters about the illusory nature of laws in this regard through the text-based representation of a thought experiment, not on the nature of time but, on the nature of natural law through time. Natural law here does not mean a religious ethic found in Natural Law. 

For laws’ operation through matter as a consistency, matter in the real universe and the reverse universe will be the same. However, against common sense or ordinary experience in the real universe, balls will bounce up the stairs rather than down. This peculiarity speaks to the strangeness of the reverse universe compared to the real universe. 

The stairs “throw” the ball up – utterly peculiar, strange. Physical law describes the actions of the ball, the how. Such a why, though, it seems entirely queer. Sidis proposes this within the framework of the common denominator of the real universe and the reverse universe. 

One is the Second Law of Thermodynamics with the energy of the universe “constantly running down.” With differences of energy in different volumes of the universe, the cosmos will equalize the energy distribution, eventually. 

Further, he explains. Any law connected to this Second Law of Thermodynamics will be irreversible by derivation as well. Even though, energy can be reconverted; heat will be lost. The energetic clock runs down, not up, here.  

This is an example of an irreversible law when contrasting the real universe and the reverse universe, of Sidis. He considers the Second Law of Thermodynamics, in fact, the “sole” difference between them. 

What is the reason for this universal peculiarity? With a universe running down from the concentrated forms of energy to pure evenly distributed heat means the universe will exact upon itself a state in which no further state transitions seem possible: a dead universe as the real universe, in the end. 

In the reverse universe, the universe, in some sense, winds up, not with a loss of heat with collisions, but an increase in heat or molar kinetic energy. Heat is gained, not lost when contrasting the reverse universe and the real universe collisions. 

When comparing a machine efficiency to the physical laws, Sidis measures all as less than 100% efficient, because heat is lost, not gained. By its nature, in the thought experiment, the reverse universe becomes more than 100% efficient – let’s call this superefficient. 

In turn, the reverse time universe becomes superefficient vis-à-vis mechanical efficiency to the point of a minimum of >/= 100% in the real universe. Yet, as physical property mirrors one to the other, the reverse universe maps onto the real universe in most respects with the mechanical efficiencies, potentially, as reflective of one to the other in terms of supraefficiency and superefficiency. 

One universe’s supraefficiency is another’s superefficiency when considered on a reversal of the factor or variable of temporality. Sidis remarks on temperature too. With two bodies at 0° and 200° Fahrenheit, the available energy would be represented by the temperature of the hotter body or the one corresponding to 200° Fahrenheit.

While, at the same time, the colder body remains 460° above Absolute Zero here. In each of the two bodies, there is 460° of unavailable energy for the two. With the same mass and specific heat, the total available energy, under the Second Law of Thermodynamics, would be 460° and 460° plus a corresponding 0° and 200° Fahrenheit, respectively, for a total of 1,120° Fahrenheit between the two bodies.

The total energy available becomes 200°:1,120° for a total energy conversion possibility of 18%. Energy in this available form becomes unavailable because of the Second Law of Thermodynamics with the amount of available energy in the universe consistently running down and not up. Cosmos exists as zero-sum in this framework, so far.

A cosmogony, cosmology, and eschatology of the transient and the self-constrictive. A constriction bound by the progression of time as experienced as an Arrow of Time moving ‘forward.’ In such a reverse universe, energy is not dissipated as heat but inculcated or absorbed – in a manner of speaking – into the bodies in an environment.

“Bodies” here means general bodies, not human or animal alone. Energy below the coldest is drawn upon as a reserve and there exists a reserve fund of energy building energy differences based on reserve rather than dissipation, as in a supraefficiency versus a superefficiency.

is time an illusion - real and reverse universe
894
Save

Opinions and Perspectives

PhoebeH commented PhoebeH 2 years ago

The implications for energy and heat flow are particularly relevant to current environmental concerns.

5
JadeXO commented JadeXO 2 years ago

I keep thinking about how different technology would be in a reverse universe.

5
JamesP1995 commented JamesP1995 2 years ago

It's amazing how deeply the second law of thermodynamics is woven into our reality.

4
SadieReed commented SadieReed 2 years ago

The mathematical treatment of efficiency above 100% is particularly interesting from an engineering perspective.

2
SereneSoul commented SereneSoul 2 years ago

This makes me wonder about all the other possible variations of universal laws we haven't considered.

0
PowerCoupleMode commented PowerCoupleMode 2 years ago

The reverse universe concept really helps illustrate why our physical laws work the way they do.

8
MidnightRider commented MidnightRider 2 years ago

Reading this changed how I think about the relationship between time and energy.

2
MeadowS commented MeadowS 3 years ago

The technical details are complex but the core idea is beautifully simple.

0
Daisy_Rays commented Daisy_Rays 3 years ago

I love how this challenges our basic assumptions about how the universe works.

0
EthanMoore commented EthanMoore 3 years ago

The article gives me a new appreciation for how fundamental thermodynamics is to our reality.

6
Harlow99 commented Harlow99 3 years ago

These ideas seem more relevant now than ever with our current energy challenges.

4
GlowUpNutrition commented GlowUpNutrition 3 years ago

The concept of energy reserves building up instead of depleting is fascinating. Completely flips our understanding.

8
Moira99 commented Moira99 3 years ago

Does anyone else find it amazing how one law can create such fundamental differences between universes?

3
Glam-Babe_20 commented Glam-Babe_20 3 years ago

The comparison between the two universes really highlights how special our thermodynamic laws are.

2
Edgy_And_Classy commented Edgy_And_Classy 3 years ago

I'm struck by how mathematical logic can lead us to such counterintuitive conclusions.

0
Style-Guru commented Style-Guru 3 years ago

This whole discussion makes me question what we consider normal versus strange in physics.

5

The description of heat absorption rather than dissipation is particularly interesting to me.

0

Wonder what other consequences of reverse thermodynamics we haven't considered yet.

1

The implications for causality are mind-bending. How would cause and effect work in such a universe?

2
Stylish-Voyage commented Stylish-Voyage 3 years ago

I appreciate how the author builds the argument step by step, even though the conclusions are pretty wild.

0
SawyerX commented SawyerX 3 years ago

The article really challenges our assumptions about what's possible in physics.

6
MarkT commented MarkT 3 years ago

This reminds me of discussions about Maxwell's Demon, but on a universal scale.

7
Simon_Spotlight commented Simon_Spotlight 3 years ago

The concept of available versus unavailable energy is crucial to understanding both universes.

4
DigitalExplorer commented DigitalExplorer 3 years ago

Never thought about how energy conversion percentages would work in a reverse universe. Really makes you think.

4
Nadia_Sky commented Nadia_Sky 3 years ago

Would love to see modern physicists' take on these ideas. Some seem surprisingly relevant to current theories.

0
PatrickLee commented PatrickLee 3 years ago

The mathematical framework seems solid, even if the concepts feel counterintuitive.

1

Yes, and I think that's key to understanding why the second law is so special compared to other physical laws.

5
PlantBasedJoy commented PlantBasedJoy 3 years ago

Anyone else find it interesting how heat behaves so differently in the reverse universe?

0
Blow_Brief commented Blow_Brief 3 years ago

The idea of a universe winding up instead of down is weirdly optimistic compared to our entropy-bound reality.

7

I keep coming back to the practical implications. Could this help us design better energy systems?

6
Freya_Rain commented Freya_Rain 3 years ago

The author's thought experiment helps show how our intuitions about causality might be biased by our universe's properties.

2
NeonCyberX commented NeonCyberX 3 years ago

This feels like it connects to modern discussions about time crystals and quantum mechanics.

7
JacksonEdwards commented JacksonEdwards 3 years ago

The cosmological implications are staggering when you really think about it.

5
ParallelHorizon commented ParallelHorizon 3 years ago

Still not convinced that the second law is the only difference. Seems like there would be other implications we haven't considered.

4
CallieB commented CallieB 3 years ago

Fascinating how one law can make such a fundamental difference between two versions of reality.

1
Colette_Hope commented Colette_Hope 3 years ago

The explanation of mechanical efficiency really clicked for me. It's like comparing a downhill roll to an uphill climb.

7
Pixar_Lover2002 commented Pixar_Lover2002 3 years ago

Would consciousness work differently in a reverse universe? The article doesn't address this but it makes me wonder.

3

The article made me realize how much we take the direction of time for granted in our physical theories.

2

I wonder how these concepts relate to current theories about the expansion of the universe.

3
Chic_Attitude commented Chic_Attitude 3 years ago

The distinction between available and unavailable energy helped me understand entropy better than my college textbooks did.

5
VinylCollectorX commented VinylCollectorX 3 years ago

Not necessarily. Sometimes complex ideas require complex explanations. Physics isn't always intuitive.

7
Phoebe_Starry commented Phoebe_Starry 3 years ago

The temperature calculations seem overly complex. There must be a simpler way to explain this concept.

5
Talia_Dusk commented Talia_Dusk 3 years ago

Anyone else notice how this connects to modern theories about time's arrow? Seems ahead of its time.

8
Movie_Buff24 commented Movie_Buff24 3 years ago

I never realized how fundamental the second law of thermodynamics is to our understanding of reality.

4

The article could have used more concrete examples. Some of the theoretical concepts are hard to visualize.

7
LaurenWhite commented LaurenWhite 3 years ago

These ideas would make a great sci-fi story. Imagine exploring a universe where all our basic assumptions about physics are reversed.

1
BeyondTheStars commented BeyondTheStars 3 years ago

The concept of reserve energy in the reverse universe is mind-bending. Like an anti-entropy force gathering energy instead of dispersing it.

8
Alexander-Thomas commented Alexander-Thomas 3 years ago

I find it interesting how the article suggests that most physical laws would work the same in both universes. Really highlights the special nature of thermodynamics.

5
EverleighJ commented EverleighJ 3 years ago

The language gets pretty technical in places. Had to read some sections multiple times to grasp the concepts.

8

Reading this changed my perspective on time itself. Maybe time's direction is just another physical property we take for granted.

1
MilesBennett commented MilesBennett 3 years ago

The comparison between efficiency ratings above 100% reminds me of perpetual motion machines, which we know are impossible in our universe.

7
QuinnXO commented QuinnXO 3 years ago

Wonder what other physical laws might look different if we could somehow observe the reverse universe.

0
InfinityGuardian commented InfinityGuardian 3 years ago

The mathematical consistency is impressive, even if the concepts seem counterintuitive.

1
OOTD_Queen_11 commented OOTD_Queen_11 3 years ago

I appreciate how the article uses everyday examples like bouncing balls to explain complex theoretical physics.

8
Manjoo_Musings commented Manjoo_Musings 3 years ago

But in the reverse universe, things would be getting more organized and energetic over time. Almost like evolution in reverse.

7
MilenaH commented MilenaH 3 years ago

The idea of a dead universe as the ultimate endpoint is pretty depressing when you think about it.

6
Sophia-Grace commented Sophia-Grace 3 years ago

This whole concept makes me question what we consider normal in our universe. Maybe our laws aren't as absolute as we think.

1

Sure! Think of it like a battery. In our universe, batteries drain. In the reverse universe, they'd naturally charge up. The temperature examples show how energy distributes differently.

0

Can anyone explain in simpler terms how the available energy calculations work? The Fahrenheit examples confused me a bit.

3
SkyeX commented SkyeX 3 years ago

What strikes me most is how the reverse universe isn't just our universe backwards, but a fundamentally different system with its own internal logic.

6
Alice_Sunflower commented Alice_Sunflower 3 years ago

The zero-sum framework makes sense mathematically, but I struggle with the practical applications in either universe.

5

Love how Sidis distinguishes between natural laws and religious Natural Law. Important clarification that many might miss.

1

The article seems to dance around the philosophical implications. If time reversal changes how energy behaves, what does that say about causality?

6

I'm curious about the practical implications. Could understanding these concepts lead to better energy efficiency in our own universe?

2
Mackenzie commented Mackenzie 3 years ago

This reminds me of watching videos played backwards. Everything follows physical laws but looks completely unnatural to us.

7
Vivienne_Love commented Vivienne_Love 3 years ago

The temperature examples really helped clarify the concept for me. I never considered how the absolute zero baseline affects available energy calculations.

8
ThrillerBuff2024 commented ThrillerBuff2024 3 years ago

Actually, that's the whole point of the article. Our understanding of entropy only applies to our universe. The reverse universe would operate under different principles.

5
Style_Haute commented Style_Haute 3 years ago

The way heat behaves in the reverse universe sounds impossible to me. How can you gain heat from collisions? It goes against everything we know about entropy.

8

I'm still trying to understand the terminology. What exactly does supraefficiency mean compared to superefficiency in this context?

3
VandeHei_View commented VandeHei_View 3 years ago

The mechanical efficiency comparison between universes really caught my attention. It's mind-bending to think about something being more than 100% efficient, even theoretically.

0
ParallelSurfer commented ParallelSurfer 3 years ago

Reading about the energy conversion rates made me think about my old physics classes. Never thought about it in terms of available versus unavailable energy like this before.

8
LeahH commented LeahH 3 years ago

I disagree with some points here. The author seems to oversimplify the relationship between physical laws and their reversibility. There must be other factors at play.

2

The concept of balls bouncing up stairs in a reverse universe really helped me visualize how weird things would be. I can't wrap my head around how that would actually look in real life!

1
AdeleM commented AdeleM 3 years ago

I find it fascinating how Sidis presents the second law of thermodynamics as the only real difference between our universe and its reverse counterpart. It makes me wonder about all the strange implications.

1

Get Free Access To Our Publishing Resources

Independent creators, thought-leaders, experts and individuals with unique perspectives use our free publishing tools to express themselves and create new ideas.

Start Writing