The 10 Weirdest Spacecraft Ever Proposed

A list of the ten strangest spacecraft that was ever seriously proposed.

For every spacecraft successfully launched into space, there are many proposed spacecraft that never see the light of day. While some of these proposed spacecraft are realistic interpolation of existing technology, others speculate about future technological development. 

The vehicles' weirdness either comes from its design, fuel source, or mission goals. But all were not developed for a variety of reasons, from simple budget issues to dealing with highly speculative technology. 

Here is the list of the 10 Weirdest Spacecraft ever proposed by scientists and engineers:

1. Belcomm Manned Venus Flyby

Belcomm Manned Venus Flyby

A proposal from the Apollo Application Program to show Congress potential future uses for the technology developed for the Apollo program. While some of these proposals were reasonable, like a space station or a moonbase, there were some more absurd proposals like a crewed flyby of Venus. 

The proposed craft would be a space station made out of the upper rocket stage of Saturn V. This upper stage would however only be habitable after the fuel stored in it was all used to get it into an orbit that would both pass by Venus and return to Earth. 

This project did not go forward for a ton of reasons. The main reason was that the project was too expensive, and mission goals could be fulfilled more cheaply and safely by a robot probe. The other being that having to rocket fuel proof a space station worth of equipment was an expensive and complicated proposition.  

2. Project Orion 

Project Orion

The most well-known design here, Project Orion, is a spacecraft propelled by a nuclear explosion created by a small bomb. First proposed General Atomics in the late 1950s, Project Orion's purpose was to get a massive amount of cargo from the Earth's surface and travel to other planets.

Neither the US air force nor NASA accepted Project Orion. The reason that the air force was not interested in developing a space program. For NASA, the lack of interest resulted from Project Orion rendering their Saturn V project redundant. Project Orion was ultimately killed by the partial test treaty-ban of 1963 preventing the use of nuclear weapons in space.  

3. HELIOS 

HELIOS

Proposed by rocket scientist Krafft Ehricke in 1959, the HELIOS was an interesting-looking design for a nuclear-powered rocket. HELIOS was an acronym for Heteropowered Earth-Launched Inter-Orbital Spacecraft and was a proposal for a craft meant to go and land on the moon. 

The HELIOS' design was a nuclear rocket dragging a crew capsule behind it at 300 meters to prevent the crew from being exposed to radiation created by the rocket engine. The reason for the rocket's location in front of the crew capsule was to make a moon landing easier as the crew would not need to climb down a ladder of a tall rocket. 

The design did not go through for many reasons. The reasoning ranged from the Saturn V being easier to develop; to NASA having cold feet on developing nuclear rockets. The project's final blow was the discovery that a 300 meters separation was too little distance to protect astronauts from the engine's radiation.   

4. Project MALLAR

Project MALLAR

During the late 50s and early 60s, NASA created a massive body of proposals for a future Moon mission that includes the HELIOS proposal. One of the more bizarre-looking but practical in design was Project MALLAR.

Project MALLAR was proposed in 1961 by Bill Michell and was plans for the craft to enter a parking orbit around the moon and then detach a smaller lander to land on the moon. What makes this design weird was Michell giving the craft a massive solar array that made it look like it had wings. 

While NASA initially did not support Mitchell's idea, they ended up vindicating his theory in the end. While NASA did not use his design, the Apollo Program used his concept of a multipart lunar orbiter that detached a smaller lander. 

5. Cole Aldebaran 

Cole Aldebaran 

The Cole Aldebaran was the strangest plan resulting from the Cole Nuclear Pulse engine. Designed by aerospace visionary,  Dandridge Cole in response to his view that the Project Orion was inefficient and wasted most of the energy created by a nuclear bomb, not knowing that Project Orion had bombs designed to make them more efficient.

Cole proposed to have the bomb be exploded in a gigantic reaction chamber with a nozzle at the bottom to funnel the explosion to propel the craft. One of the designs proposed to use this engine was Cole Aldebaran. The Cole Aldebaran was the massive jet launched from the ocean surface because the seawater would both help funnel the explosion and cool the engine. 

Nobody ever built a Cole Nuclear Pulse Engine for similar reasons to Project Orion, but the Cole Alderbaran had some additional issues. Mainly that the Cole Aldebaran had a more open engine that would create a massive amount of nuclear fallout.    

6. Langely Unpressurized Crew Xport

Langely Unpressurized Crew Xport

The Langely Unpressurized Crew Xport answers the question of what would be the minimum required for a working lunar lander. A recent proposal in 2019 for the upcoming 2024 Artemis missions to the moon. Langely designed the lander around a technology called Suitport. Suitport is simply a spacesuit that serves as an airlock for a vehicle.

What moves design into the weird is its ascent stage. Mainly that instead of pressurized, this craft's ascent stage would require Astronaut to wear spacesuits on an exposed metal platform on the ride back to orbit. It's very telling that in 2020, NASA did not approve this proposal to be the lander for the Artemis program.  

7. Kuck's Mosquito 

Kuck's Mosquito 

Not all weird spacecraft designs are for a crewed mission; Kuck's Mosquito is an uncrewed one. Engineer David Kuck designed this craft to serve as the base for future infrastructure for interplanetary colonization. The Kuck's Mosquito weirdness comes from its simple design.

The Kuck's Mosquito is a water-filled bag with a rocket attached to it and the addition of some steam-powered drill.  This simple craft's mission is to travel to comets and asteroids to mine water from them. This water then can be used for water, rocket fuel, and oxygen for other space missions. 

Unlike previous entries, the Kuck's Mosquito has no one has rejected it and could still serve the future development of space-based infrastructure.  

8. Water Balloon Ship 

Water Balloon Ship 

A close cousin of the Kuck's Mosquito, Anthony Zuppero proposed design is an uncrewed craft designed to transport a ton of water from the Martian moon of Deimos to low earth orbit. Like the mosquito, the Water Balloon Ship's weirdness comes from its simplicity.  

Water Balloon Ship designed is simple in concept. The ship is a giant balloon that stores water collected from either added mining equipment or a separate mining craft.  A nuclear-powered rocket then propelled the ballon towards a low-Earth orbit.  

9. Gevaltig 

Gevaltig

Gevalitig is an overkill answer to the question of how to get to Mars in 100 days. The craft was designed in 1989 by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for the Vehicle of Interplanetary Space Transport Application. Gevaltig is a giant engine powered by fusion. 

The Gevaltig is a massive craft standing over 200 meters tall. The spacecraft is an engine covered in radiators thanks to the heat created by its fusion reactor.  On the engine's top is a circle of habits and lander for the mars mission. 

The craft has remained unmade for a ton of reasons. For one, the spacecraft required an undeveloped fusion reactor. The other main reason is the engine is very inefficient and massive compare to other Mars mission proposals. 

10. Mars Umbrella Ship

Mars Umbrella Ship

The Mars Umbrella Ship was one of the first proposed a crewed expedition to Mars. The craft was designed in 1957 by Ernst Sthulinger for the US Army Ballistic Missile Agency study for a potential Mars mission. The design was rocketed to fame thanks to it appearing in the Disney-produced documentary Mars & Beyond. 

The craft is a space station propelled by an ion drive and powered by a nuclear reactor separate from the rest of the spacecraft by a long column. The spacecraft also includes a rocket dispatchable for landing on Mars. 

NASA never developed a spacecraft due to the design not fitting well with the path that space exploration technology was developing towards. Another reason is that the craft's ion drive is way too weak to propel a spaceship to Mars.


Conclusion 

These ten spacecraft represent some of the weird highlights of the proposed spacecraft design. These spacecraft scratch the surface of this large body of proposed spacecraft and their exact technical details. These spacecraft also represent alternate and future paths that space exploration could take. 

I am sure this list will spark an interest in examining the fun world of proposed spacecraft.

146
Save

Opinions and Perspectives

LorelaiS commented LorelaiS 3 years ago

Some of these ideas might be worth revisiting with modern technology.

6
Marcus_Memo commented Marcus_Memo 3 years ago

The nuclear propulsion concepts were ambitious but maybe too ahead of their time.

8
Celestia_Wonder commented Celestia_Wonder 3 years ago

Converting fuel tanks to habitats was clever. We need more of that kind of creative thinking.

0
DanaJ commented DanaJ 3 years ago

These concepts really show how far space technology has come since then.

6
Goodman_Guide commented Goodman_Guide 3 years ago

The exposed platform design seems incredibly dangerous. Glad that one didn't get approved.

7
DreamLabX commented DreamLabX 3 years ago

Water mining from comets still makes sense as a concept. We might see something like the Mosquito in the future.

2
NeonCyberX commented NeonCyberX 3 years ago

The Gevaltig shows how optimistic they were about fusion technology.

6

Project MALLAR really predicted the modular approach we use today.

4
AllisonJ commented AllisonJ 3 years ago

The Venus flyby mission seems incredibly risky by today's standards.

8
Bonnie_Twinkle commented Bonnie_Twinkle 3 years ago

It's fascinating how many different approaches they considered for solving space travel challenges.

0
JennaS commented JennaS 3 years ago

These designs really pushed the boundaries of engineering creativity.

1
AmeliaW commented AmeliaW 3 years ago

The ocean launch platform idea wasn't completely crazy. We do similar things today.

4
MatthewWright commented MatthewWright 3 years ago

The Mosquito concept could work well with today's autonomous systems.

7

Some of these ideas were just ahead of their time. The technology wasn't ready yet.

4
CinephileKing commented CinephileKing 3 years ago

Nuclear propulsion still makes sense for deep space missions. These designers were onto something.

2
Stella_L commented Stella_L 3 years ago

The Mars Umbrella Ship looks like something from a retro sci-fi movie.

2
Lillian_Glow commented Lillian_Glow 3 years ago

Modern spacecraft seem boring compared to these ambitious designs.

0
NeonWarrior commented NeonWarrior 3 years ago

I wonder what other wild spacecraft designs are sitting in archives somewhere.

6
SkywalkerSaga commented SkywalkerSaga 3 years ago

The simplicity of the Water Balloon Ship is actually quite elegant.

7
Lucia_Flutter commented Lucia_Flutter 3 years ago

Project Orion could have revolutionized space travel if not for the nuclear test ban treaty.

1
MasonTurner commented MasonTurner 3 years ago

The Unpressurized Crew Xport seems like a huge step backward in crew safety.

0
Brielle_Stardust commented Brielle_Stardust 3 years ago

These designers were really pushing the boundaries of what they thought was possible.

8
LostAstronaut commented LostAstronaut 3 years ago

The tether concept from HELIOS is similar to modern proposals for rotating artificial gravity systems.

2
Piper_Watson commented Piper_Watson 3 years ago

Water really is the key resource for space exploration. Those water-focused designs were onto something.

4

The Gevaltig fusion drive concept was interesting, just way too ambitious for the technology available.

3

I appreciate the creativity in these designs, even if they weren't practical.

0
MindsetMatters commented MindsetMatters 3 years ago

The Venus flyby mission seems incredibly optimistic about life support systems.

0

Project MALLAR really was ahead of its time with those solar arrays. Pretty impressive for 1961.

6
ZeroGravityMind commented ZeroGravityMind 3 years ago

It's amazing how many different approaches they considered for getting to Mars. We're still working on that problem.

4

The ocean launch idea wasn't completely crazy. Sea Launch proved that ocean-based launches can work.

5
Jenna_Hope commented Jenna_Hope 3 years ago

I can see why NASA wasn't keen on most of these. The complexity and risk factors were just too high.

1
TranquilityVibes commented TranquilityVibes 3 years ago

The Mosquito design is brilliant in its simplicity. Sometimes less really is more in space engineering.

3
Erica-Ball commented Erica-Ball 3 years ago

These designs really show the evolution of our understanding of space travel requirements.

4
TVRecaps_Emily commented TVRecaps_Emily 3 years ago

Converting rocket stages into habitats was clever. We should reuse more space hardware like that.

4
RickyT commented RickyT 3 years ago

The size of Gevaltig is mind-boggling. Modern designs are so much more efficient.

2
Rose_Review commented Rose_Review 3 years ago

Some of these concepts seem absurd now but they helped push the boundaries of what we thought was possible.

5
ShowtimeAddict commented ShowtimeAddict 3 years ago

That exposed platform design makes me nervous just thinking about it. Space is dangerous enough with proper protection!

2

The water mining concepts were really forward-thinking. We're still talking about similar ideas for space resources.

1
Sepinwall_Story commented Sepinwall_Story 3 years ago

I'm surprised how many of these focused on nuclear propulsion. Shows how optimistic they were about nuclear technology.

5

The Mars Umbrella Ship looks impractical but the basic idea of nuclear-electric propulsion is still relevant.

8
Piper_Shine commented Piper_Shine 3 years ago

Project Orion would have been amazing to see in action, even if just as a test. The visuals would be incredible.

8
HaileyB commented HaileyB 3 years ago

The Mosquito concept could work well with modern autonomous systems. Might be worth reconsidering.

8
YvetteM commented YvetteM 3 years ago

Imagine the maintenance nightmares on some of these designs. The complexity would have been overwhelming.

5
VivienneH commented VivienneH 3 years ago

The Venus flyby mission seems unnecessarily risky. Robotic missions make so much more sense for that kind of exploration.

6
ChakraBalance commented ChakraBalance 3 years ago

These proposals show how much trial and error goes into spacecraft design. We learned from each crazy idea.

3
Selma_Breeze commented Selma_Breeze 3 years ago

The ocean launch concept for Cole Aldebaran is fascinating, even if impractical. Similar to modern sea launch platforms.

3
UrbanVortex commented UrbanVortex 3 years ago

The Unpressurized Crew Xport seems like a step backwards. We shouldn't compromise astronaut safety to save weight.

1
Hannah commented Hannah 3 years ago

I love how they tried to solve the radiation problem with HELIOS. Not the best solution, but they were thinking about crew safety.

6
Heidi-Barrett commented Heidi-Barrett 3 years ago

Some of these designs were way ahead of their time. The solar arrays on MALLAR are similar to what we use today.

2

The Water Balloon Ship concept still has merit. We'll need water transport for future space colonies.

4

A 300-meter tether would make docking incredibly challenging. I can't imagine trying to manage that.

6
Sepinwall_Story commented Sepinwall_Story 4 years ago

Interesting how they wanted to convert the Saturn V upper stage into living space. We're doing something similar with Starship now.

3

The tether idea from HELIOS wasn't completely crazy. We use similar concepts for gravity assists in modern spacecraft.

0
WanderlustX commented WanderlustX 4 years ago

I find it interesting how many of these designs tried to solve radiation shielding. It's still a major challenge today.

8
Mikayla-Kennedy commented Mikayla-Kennedy 4 years ago

The fusion-powered Gevaltig reminds me of modern proposals for nuclear thermal propulsion. Same concept, just way more reasonable scale.

8
CyberVoyagerX commented CyberVoyagerX 4 years ago

These designs really show how our approach to space travel has evolved. We've gotten much more practical over the years.

1
Alexa commented Alexa 4 years ago

The Langley proposal sounds absolutely terrifying! I'm glad NASA had the sense to reject that one.

3
Savannah_Rose commented Savannah_Rose 4 years ago

That's a good point about the Mosquito design. Simple solutions often end up being the most practical in space exploration.

5
Sophia23 commented Sophia23 4 years ago

I wonder if some of these designs could be revisited with modern technology. The basic concepts might work better now.

4
VictoriaEvans commented VictoriaEvans 4 years ago

The Gevaltig seems like massive overkill. 100 days to Mars is impressive but at what cost? The size alone makes it impractical.

5

Project MALLAR was definitely ahead of its time with the modular approach. Pretty much predicted how we ended up doing lunar missions.

5
RockLegendX commented RockLegendX 4 years ago

The Cole Aldebaran launching from the ocean is such a bizarre concept. I can't imagine the environmental impact studies that would require today.

0
Stephens_Stories commented Stephens_Stories 4 years ago

I agree about Project Orion being wild, but you have to admit the physics behind it was sound. The main issue was political, not technical.

8
SarahMartinez commented SarahMartinez 4 years ago

A giant water balloon in space sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. One micrometeorite and the whole mission is ruined.

7
LoveYourLife commented LoveYourLife 4 years ago

The Belcomm Venus flyby proposal seems incredibly risky. Imagine being stuck in a converted fuel tank for that long of a mission.

0
Hayden-Ford commented Hayden-Ford 4 years ago

Actually the Kuck's Mosquito makes a lot of sense for mining water from comets. I could see something like that being developed in the future.

5
CodeMaster99 commented CodeMaster99 4 years ago

You have to admire the ambition of these early space pioneers, even if some ideas were completely bonkers.

2
Koppel_Reports commented Koppel_Reports 4 years ago

The 300-meter tether on HELIOS seems so impractical. I'm surprised they thought that would be enough distance from a nuclear reactor.

4
AlexandraXO commented AlexandraXO 4 years ago

That Mars Umbrella Ship looks like something straight out of 1950s sci-fi. Love how optimistic they were about ion drives back then.

1
ClaireButler commented ClaireButler 4 years ago

As crazy as Project Orion sounds, I wonder if something similar might be viable for deep space missions where radiation concerns are less of an issue.

6
IndiaJ commented IndiaJ 4 years ago

Can't believe they seriously considered having astronauts ride an exposed platform back from the moon with the Langley design. Talk about a terrifying space rollercoaster!

1
Sherman_Scoop commented Sherman_Scoop 4 years ago

The Water Balloon Ship concept is actually quite clever in its simplicity. Sometimes the best engineering solutions are the most straightforward ones.

3
SunnySoulShine commented SunnySoulShine 4 years ago

I find it fascinating how many of these designs relied on nuclear power. Project Orion seems absolutely wild using actual nuclear bombs for propulsion!

1

Get Free Access To Our Publishing Resources

Independent creators, thought-leaders, experts and individuals with unique perspectives use our free publishing tools to express themselves and create new ideas.

Start Writing